Chicago Sky vs. Phoenix Mercury: Player Stats and Game Breakdown from June 21, 2025, WNBA Matchup

Chicago Sky vs. Phoenix Mercury: Player Stats and Game Breakdown from June 21, 2025, WNBA Matchup

On June 21, 2025, the Chicago Sky took on the Phoenix Mercury in an electrifying WNBA matchup at Wintrust Arena, where the Mercury clinched a decisive 107-86 victory. This article dives into the player stats, key highlights, and critical moments of the game, targeting keywords like “Chicago Sky vs. Phoenix Mercury player stats,” “WNBA June 21, 2025,” and standout names such as “Sami Whitcomb” and “Angel Reese.” Sourced from ESPN, WNBA.com, and other reliable outlets, this recap offers fans a comprehensive look at this record-breaking clash.

Chicago Sky vs Phoenix Mercury Match Player Stats

  • Sport: Basketball
  • League: WNBA (Women’s National Basketball Association)
  • Matchup: Chicago Sky vs. Phoenix Mercury
  • Date: June 21, 2025
  • Location: Wintrust Arena, Chicago, IL
  • Final Score: Phoenix Mercury 107 – 86 Chicago Sky
  • Winner: Phoenix Mercury

Game Overview: Mercury Sets Franchise Record with 17 Three-Pointers

The Phoenix Mercury showcased their offensive firepower, tying the WNBA single-game record with 17 three-pointers en route to a 107-86 win over the Chicago Sky. This victory extended Phoenix’s winning streak to five games, boosting their record to 11-4, while the Sky fell to 3-9. With six players contributing to the three-point barrage, the Mercury set a franchise record and dominated the boards with 34 rebounds to Chicago’s 22. This performance makes the game a hot topic for searches like “WNBA three-point record 2025” and “Phoenix Mercury vs. Chicago Sky stats.”

Phoenix Mercury Player Stats: A Sharpshooting Showcase

The Mercury’s balanced attack overwhelmed the Sky, with standout performances across the roster:

  • Sami Whitcomb: Led all scorers with 17 points, sinking 5-of-8 three-pointers (62.5%). Her long-range precision was pivotal, making her a key name for “WNBA top scorers June 21, 2025.”
  • Kahleah Copper: Added 16 points on 6-of-12 shooting and dished out 4 assists. Facing her former team, her efficiency shines in searches for “Kahleah Copper stats vs. Chicago Sky.”
  • Satou Sabally: Contributed 15 points and 6 rebounds, reinforcing her all-around impact.
  • Alyssa Thomas: Scored 11 points and delivered 8 assists, surpassing Tamika Catchings for 12th on the WNBA’s all-time assists list (1,503).
  • Kalani Brown: Tallied 11 points, including a rare three-pointer—her second career triple—that sealed the record-breaking 17th three with 25.6 seconds left.
  • Kitija Laksa: Matched Brown with 11 points, hitting 3-of-5 from three, spotlighting her rookie potential.

Phoenix shot an impressive 51.5% from the field (35-of-68), 48.6% from three (17-of-35), and 83.3% from the free-throw line (20-of-24). Their 25 assists and 29 points off turnovers underscored their cohesive play and defensive pressure.

Chicago Sky Player Stats: Resilience Amid Rebounding Woes

The Sky battled hard but couldn’t overcome Phoenix’s onslaught, with rebounding struggles proving costly:

  • Kamilla Cardoso: Topped the Sky with 17 points on 7-of-12 shooting and grabbed 8 rebounds. Her interior presence stands out for “Kamilla Cardoso WNBA stats.”
  • Michaela Onyenwere: Also scored 17 points (6-of-14 FG, 3-of-5 3PT) with 4 rebounds, showcasing her scoring versatility.
  • Chennedy Carter: Added 12 points and 5 assists, though her 5-of-15 shooting reflected offensive challenges.
  • Angel Reese: Recorded 9 points and a career-low 2 rebounds on 4-of-10 shooting, a notable dip for “Angel Reese 2025 performance.”

The Sky shot 42.9% from the field (30-of-70) and 38.5% from three (10-of-26), but their 22 rebounds and 20 turnovers (leading to Phoenix’s 29 points) hampered their efforts.

Key Moments That Defined the Game

The Mercury jumped out to a hot start, draining 7 three-pointers in the first quarter, led by Whitcomb and Copper. The Sky fought back in the third quarter, with Cardoso and Onyenwere combining for 20 points, but Phoenix’s relentless shooting—capped by Brown’s record-setting three—sealed the deal. The game, attended by 7,291 fans and lasting 2 hours and 1 minute, was officiated by Maj Forsberg, Ashley Gloss, and Isaac Barnett. Highlights like these drive interest in “WNBA game highlights June 21, 2025.”

Historical Rivalry: Sky vs. Mercury Through the Years

The Sky-Mercury rivalry has been competitive, with Phoenix holding a 32-23 edge in 55 meetings since 2006. Recent matchups include:

  • May 27, 2025: Mercury won 94-89, with Satou Sabally (20 points) and Kitija Laksa (18 points) leading a comeback.
  • August 15, 2024: Mercury dominated 85-65, powered by Kahleah Copper (29 points) and Brittney Griner (23 points).
  • September 15, 2024: Sky prevailed 93-88, shooting 56% from three, led by Chennedy Carter (20 points).

The June 21, 2025, game flipped the script, with Phoenix’s perimeter dominance contrasting Chicago’s earlier success.

Why This Game Matters for WNBA Fans

This matchup resonates with fans searching “Chicago Sky vs. Phoenix Mercury box score” or “WNBA player stats June 21, 2025.” The Mercury’s historic three-point feat and the Sky’s young talent—like Cardoso and Reese—fuel discussions on ESPN, WNBA.com, and beyond. Phoenix’s playoff push and Chicago’s need for consistency make this a pivotal moment for “WNBA 2025 season analysis.”

Conclusion

The June 21, 2025, Chicago Sky vs. Phoenix Mercury game was a showcase of Phoenix’s record-tying 17 three-pointers, led by Sami Whitcomb (17 points) and Kahleah Copper (16 points), securing a 107-86 win. Kamilla Cardoso and Michaela Onyenwere (17 points each) kept the Sky competitive, but their 22 rebounds couldn’t match Phoenix’s dominance. For full stats and highlights, check NBA.com or Sofascore.com. This game is a must-know for anyone tracking “Chicago Sky vs. Phoenix Mercury player stats” or “WNBA standout performances 2025.”

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *